Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 10:18

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Stock futures fall as investors eye Israel-Iran conflict: Live updates - CNBC
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What are some creepy bestiality-promoting questions obviously asked for sexual gratification?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
United Switches Off Starlink Internet on Regional Jets After Static Problem - WSJ
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Can bosses get fired for being too hard on employees?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Former Charles Manson follower is recommended for parole - NBC News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Cleveland issues public health alert after spike in COVID-19 detected in wastewater - Cleveland.com
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thousands of galaxies revealed in a single Webb image - Earth.com